labath accepted this revision. labath added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Looks pretty straight-forward. When I wrote this test, I was expecting that an "atomic struct" would be "invalid input". Given that this is actually a thing, it would be nice to add some members to the struct to show that can be displayed too, but I can also do that afterwards... ================ Comment at: lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/DWARF/dwarf5-atomic.s:24-25 + .byte 0 # EOM(1) + .byte 0 # EOM(2) + .byte 2 # Abbreviation Code + .byte 52 # DW_TAG_variable ---------------- Looks like I didn't remote tabs here. Could you please fix this before submitting? Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71183/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71183 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
