teemperor added a comment. In D70314#1747711 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70314#1747711>, @labath wrote:
> Semi-random idea: Instead of running the expression through the command line > and then unpacking the result, should we just use the appropriate SBFrame api > here (EvaluateExpression/GetValueForVariablePath)? That's one of the APIs we need to test, but we need to test all of them to prevent regressions like D67803 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67803>. At least `frame var` and `expr` behave very differently (EvaluateExpression should be similar to `expr` but I never looked at that code path). So the idea is to have one command that tests all these APIs and if we can't do that (for example because the expression can't be repeated with the same result), at least make that safer/easier to do. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70314/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70314 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
