teemperor added a comment. In D67227#1730144 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67227#1730144>, @tatyana-krasnukha wrote:
> Another problem of the `test_ir_interpreter` is that it fails even when JIT > fails despite it should test the interpreter. Well, it also tests that the IRInterpreter is equivalent to what we would JIT (i.e., our interpreting-vs-JITing optimisation is actually working as intended). CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67227/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67227 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
