aprantl accepted this revision. aprantl added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
> The one barrier we have right now is that it is not possible to run the "lit" > suite with a different compiler, and that's something I think we should keep. Very much agreed. > For the test which don't need a host executable, I don't think that running > them for each available target would be useful, as they generally don't care > about those details. That's plausible. Thanks for sharing your thoughts! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69619/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69619 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
