labath added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.h:235-245
   PythonObject &operator=(const PythonObject &other) {
     Reset(PyRefType::Borrowed, other.get());
     return *this;
   }
 
-  void Reset(PythonObject &&other) {
+  PythonObject &operator=(PythonObject &&other) {
     Reset();
----------------
lawrence_danna wrote:
> labath wrote:
> > lawrence_danna wrote:
> > > labath wrote:
> > > > You can consider simplifying this further down to a "universal"/"sink" 
> > > > `operator=(PythonObject other)`. Since the object is really just a 
> > > > pointer, the extra object being created won't hurt (in fact, the 
> > > > removal of `&`-indirection might make things faster).
> > > wouldn't that result in an extra retain and release every time a 
> > > PythonObject was copied instead of referenced or moved?
> > No, it shouldn't, because the temporary PythonObject will be 
> > move-constructed (== no refcount traffic), if the operator= is called with 
> > an xvalue (if the rhs was not an xvalue, then you wouldn't end up calling 
> > the `&&` overload anyway). Then you can move the temporary object into 
> > *this, and avoid refcount traffic again.
> > 
> > So, there is an additional PythonObject created, but it's move-constructed 
> > if possible, which should be efficient, if I understand these classes 
> > correctly. This is the recommended practice (at least by some) when you 
> > don't want to squeeze every last nanosecond of performance..
> How do you move the temporary object into *this, if you only have 
> `operator=(PythonObject other)` to assign with?
In case that wasn't clear, the idea is to replace two operator= overloads with 
a single universal one taking a temporary. The advantage of that is less 
opportunities to implement move/copy incorrectly. The cost is one temporary 
move-constructed object more.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69080/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69080



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to