mstorsjo added a comment.

In D68980#1709931 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68980#1709931>, @labath wrote:

> In D68980#1709884 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68980#1709884>, 
> @stella.stamenova wrote:
>
> > The two things that come to mind are the path to clang-cl (which is 
> > sometimes a clang build and sometimes installed on the system as part of a 
> > VS installation or an LLVM installation) as well as the path to the linker 
> > when it is needed. This is most often an issue in the case of a VS install 
> > - I don't remember all the details any more, but I believe that before Zach 
> > added the script, we were often picking up the wrong clang-cl and ending up 
> > not being able to compile the tests at all.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Was this during a standalone lldb build? In a non-standalone build, lit 
> should definitely prefer the just-built clang/lld (and if it doesn't, it 
> should be fixed to do that). The situation is more complicated for a 
> standalone build because the clang binary is sort of out of our control. But, 
> in this case, I don't see how having build.py around can help, because the 
> information about which clang to use has to come externally anyway...


How do tests like test/Shell/Register/x86*.test work in such standalone builds 
then? They use lines like these:

  # XFAIL: system-windows
  # REQUIRES: native && target-x86_64
  # RUN: %clangxx -fomit-frame-pointer %p/Inputs/x86-64-gp-read.cpp -o %t
  # RUN: %lldb -b -s %s %t | FileCheck %s

(The XFAIL for system-windows, at least in this test, when I tried it out, 
seemed to relate to the fact that `register read --all` on windows didn't 
include all the 32 bit subregisters.)

If tests already can use such constrcuts, I don't see why we couldn't use `# 
RUN: %clang_cl ..`, as lit sets up `%clang_cl` in the same way as `%clangxx`.


Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D68980/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D68980



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to