mstorsjo added a comment. In D68939#1707985 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68939#1707985>, @labath wrote:
> Would you say that "pc" is a reasonable value for the "vendor" field for the > win+aarch64 combo? I am asking because I don't have a clue about that, and > given that this platform is being brought up right now, changing this now > would be way easier than doing it later. (The reason why things don't work is > the incompatibility between the two things that compute the ArchSpec, but > that can also be fixed by changing the other mechanism, if that is > better/more correct.) My guess is the other mechanism is > ArchSpec::SetArchitecture function, line 928... I'd say "pc" is fine here; such machines are available for sale (although with a bit scarce availability) as normal power efficient laptops - google for e.g. HP Envy X2, for one that is available with both arm and x86 cpu options. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68939/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68939 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
