kwk created this revision.
Herald added a project: LLDB.
Herald added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
kwk added a reviewer: jankratochvil.
kwk edited the summary of this revision.
jankratochvil added a comment.

Personally I would check GIT history for some reasons it was written this way.


The indicated dead code may have performed some action; that action will never 
occur.

In lldb_private::LoadedModuleInfoList::LoadedModuleInfo::operator 
==(lldb_private::LoadedModuleInfoList::LoadedModuleInfo const &): Code can 
never be reached because of a logical contradiction (CWE-561)

Coverity Scan: 
https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v39507/p12195/fileInstanceId=27614986&defectInstanceId=8037484&mergedDefectId=221581

CID 221581


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

https://reviews.llvm.org/D67915

Files:
  lldb/include/lldb/Core/LoadedModuleInfoList.h


Index: lldb/include/lldb/Core/LoadedModuleInfoList.h
===================================================================
--- lldb/include/lldb/Core/LoadedModuleInfoList.h
+++ lldb/include/lldb/Core/LoadedModuleInfoList.h
@@ -84,9 +84,6 @@
     }
 
     bool operator==(LoadedModuleInfo const &rhs) const {
-      if (e_num != rhs.e_num)
-        return false;
-
       for (size_t i = 0; i < e_num; ++i) {
         if (m_has[i] != rhs.m_has[i])
           return false;


Index: lldb/include/lldb/Core/LoadedModuleInfoList.h
===================================================================
--- lldb/include/lldb/Core/LoadedModuleInfoList.h
+++ lldb/include/lldb/Core/LoadedModuleInfoList.h
@@ -84,9 +84,6 @@
     }
 
     bool operator==(LoadedModuleInfo const &rhs) const {
-      if (e_num != rhs.e_num)
-        return false;
-
       for (size_t i = 0; i < e_num; ++i) {
         if (m_has[i] != rhs.m_has[i])
           return false;
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
  • [Lldb-commits] [PAT... Konrad Wilhelm Kleine via Phabricator via lldb-commits

Reply via email to