amccarth added a comment.

I've been trying to figure out how to implement the same functionality you've 
got here, so I'm very interested in helping you land this in some form.

I think Clayborg and Pavel makes some good points about where the right layer 
of abstraction is for the unwind plans.  I've copied your patch locally and 
will try out some different ideas and report back.

This patch is pretty large.  It might be easier to break it up into a series of 
small steps to get there.  The bullet points in the CL description might be a 
good roadmap for such a break-up.  But let's first figure out the right 
abstraction points.


Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D67347/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D67347



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to