labath added a comment. In D65952#1623297 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65952#1623297>, @clayborg wrote:
> So I am confused. Are we keeping SymbolVendor around for locating symbols > files or are we getting rid of it entirely? Well... right now my idea was to keep it around as an class with just some static methods for the purposes of locating symbol files, though I'm open to other ideas too. After this patch the SymbolVendor class will contain just one method (FindPlugin), but I think that in the future it could be used to host functionality that is common for different symbol vendors. Here, I'm mainly thinking of `Symbols/LocateSymbolFile.cpp` (formerly `Host/Symbols.cpp`), which contains a bunch of functionality for searching for symbol files (so it could fall under the symbol vendor mandate), and it is currently being called by other symbol vendors to do their job. However, it is also being called from placed other than symbol vendors, and so more refactoring would be needed for that to fit in neatly. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65952/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65952 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
