JDevlieghere added a comment. In D65611#1615083 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65611#1615083>, @labath wrote:
> So what if the user doesn't do `lldb ./foo` but instead does `file ./foo` at > the lldb comand prompt? Then, you'll be back at square one as far as > reproducers are concerned... We definitely need the VFS change for the reproducers, no argument there. My earlier comment was more about the change in general, orthogonal to the reproducers. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65611/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65611 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
