sgraenitz added a comment. > If we want to add git at all, we should probably mention it somewhere else. > I'm not sure where that would be - I suppose somewhere where it makes sense > to worry about the minimum version, e.g. where the git-llvm script is > concerned.
Agree, changed that. > See the llvm-commits replies to r365917; at least one code owner is stuck > with 1.8.3. This is here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190715/674326.html > The only real requirement here is "whatever the oldest version someone's > actually used recently". Couple that with git not being a core requirement, > I'd rather just say nothing, unless we had an affirmative intent to /not/ > support some particular version. It may complicate the git-llvm script, but it seems to work so far, so fair enough. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65436/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65436 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
