JDevlieghere added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/lldb/Expression/DynamicCheckerFunctions.h:19
+
+/// \class DynamicCheckerFunctions DynamicCheckerFunctions.h
+/// "lldb/Expression/DynamicCheckerFunctions.h" Encapsulates dynamic check
----------------
Can we skip this boilerplate?
================
Comment at: include/lldb/Expression/DynamicCheckerFunctions.h:27
+///
+/// a = *b; // check that b is a valid pointer [b init]; // check that b
+/// is a valid object to send "init" to
----------------
Reflow comment.
================
Comment at: source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ClangExpressionParser.cpp:1307
+ process->GetDynamicCheckers())) {
+ IRDynamicChecks ir_dynamic_checks(*checker_funcs,
----------------
Spurious newline?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64591/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64591
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
