labath added a comment. In D62755#1527679 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755#1527679>, @xiaobai wrote:
> > So, what I'd do (and what I have been doing so far, but mainly as a > > passtime effort) was to cut the dependencies way lower that this. Ideally, > > I wouldn't want to include anything from the `Target` library in > > lldb-server, possibly by moving some stuff that lldb-server does need to > > use (MemoryRegionInfo) out of it. > > Yeah, I'd like to see this happen as well. My efforts are twofold: Remove > non-plugin libraries dependencies on plugin libraries, and move things out of > the core libraries into plugins (and possibly new non-plugin libraries, if it > makes sense). There are many dependency issues that I'm not yet aware of. I'm > hoping to uncover more as I keep decoupling. Sounds good. I'm looking forward to seeing how this turns out. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
