labath added a comment.

In D62755#1527679 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755#1527679>, @xiaobai wrote:

> > So, what I'd do (and what I have been doing so far, but mainly as a 
> > passtime effort) was to cut the dependencies way lower that this. Ideally, 
> > I wouldn't want to include anything from the `Target` library in 
> > lldb-server, possibly by moving some stuff that lldb-server does need to 
> > use (MemoryRegionInfo) out of it.
>
> Yeah, I'd like to see this happen as well. My efforts are twofold: Remove 
> non-plugin libraries dependencies on plugin libraries, and move things out of 
> the core libraries into plugins (and possibly new non-plugin libraries, if it 
> makes sense). There are many dependency issues that I'm not yet aware of. I'm 
> hoping to uncover more as I keep decoupling.


Sounds good. I'm looking forward to seeing how this turns out.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to