labath added a comment. Regarding the test, I am wondering whether requiring the `/proc/%d/maps` and the linker rendezvous structure to match isn't too strict of a requirement. Dynamic linkers (and particularly android dynamic linkers) do a lot of crazy stuff, and trying to assert this invariant exposes us to all kinds of "optimizations" that the linkers do or may do in the future. I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to just build an executable with one or two dependent libraries, and then just assert that their entries are present in the library list. However, I'm not completely sure on this, so I'd like to hear what you think about that..
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62502/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62502 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
