jingham requested changes to this revision. jingham added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed.
This seems like carrying purity a little too far. You haven't removed the fact that the using code is explicitly dialing up the C++ language runtime, you've just made the call-site a little harder to read. I don't see any problem with having explicit accessors for the commonly used language runtimes. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
