teemperor added a comment. Not sure if I like this change. We don't have single dash flags with multiple characters in LLDB, so this flag looks a bit out of place. And there is the bigger question if we really want to be compatible with the GDB flags (which are already incompatible with the flags LLDB is currently offering). If we really go this way then I would suggest we also add more commonly used GDB flags like `--args`.
================ Comment at: lldb/tools/driver/Options.td:164 + Alias<one_line>, + HelpText<"Alias for --one-line. This exists just to ease adoption of LLDB for GDB users.">, + Group<grp_command>; ---------------- Usually alias don't have any motivation/description, so the "This exists just to ease adoption of LLDB for GDB users." isn't really necessary (and just clutters the help page IMHO). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61737/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61737 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
