On 30/04/2019 20:24, Jonas Devlieghere wrote:
Hey Pavel,
Apologies if I was too hasty, given the number of XFAILs I assumed the
test was a WIP and the missing darwin was an oversight.
Here's the output on my machine: https://reviews.llvm.org/P8142
No worries. Darwin is actually the one place which has this implemented.
However, judging by your output, that support isn't fully functional
either (you have %zmm16-32, but not their %ymm and %xmm counterparts).
Michal, given this, I think we should remove the ymm and xmm
expectations from this test (or leave them commented out with a note),
so that we at least test the part of this feature that is actually
working. Otherwise we'll end up with a test that is XFAILed everywhere..
pl
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
