JDevlieghere added a comment. I'm on the fence on this one. I think the `==` pattern attracts more attention to the fact that we are comparing strings. However, I also see the benefit, like in the example, where even a temporary variable wouldn't help much.
Regarding the name, how would you feel about `anyOf` instead? Although not relevant here, it has a nice duality with `allOf`. I think this is what the AST matchers use. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61231/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61231 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
