labath added a comment. Thanks for adding the test.
I guess I've touched this bit when I was working on the dwarf5 index thingy, but all my memory of this function has already been swapped out (and I'm not sure I ever fully understood all the nuances of how it was supposed to work). So yeah, I think this is fine but I don't feel very qualified to make that claim. ================ Comment at: packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/cpp/global_variables/TestGlobalVariables.py:20 + @expectedFailureAll(oslist=["windows"], bugnumber="llvm.org/pr24764") + @expectedFailureAll(oslist=["linux"], archs=["aarch64"], bugnumber="llvm.org/pr37301") + def test(self): ---------------- I don't think this bug applies here, as we're inspecting a running process, though we don't have any arm64 bots running ATM to verify that. I'd just remove this XFAIL. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60737/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60737 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
