friss added a comment. In D60468#1460013 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60468#1460013>, @clayborg wrote:
> Almost seems like we can build the mutex into the base class OptionValue as > we need general threaded protection for every setting. They any function that > gets or sets the value should be able to protect itself using the base mutex If we generalize this to most other properties, then this would make sense. Note that all properties that store very simple types don't need this, as they don't risk being accessed in a broken state. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60468/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60468 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
