sgraenitz added a comment.

> [LLVM_LIBRARY_DIR is] not a cache variable when it's an in-tree build

Great, then please go ahead.

> From what I remember, you added back [...]

Yes this was a quick-fix. I didn't have the patience in that moment to check 
each of them individually.

> If there's a situation where any of these variables don't get propagated from 
> the LLVMConfig, I'd like to know about it so I can add comments above these 
> variables explaining why these variables are set since it's non-obvious just 
> from grepping the lldb tree.

It's usually a good idea to check both, the LLVMConfig.cmake from a build-tree 
and from an install-tree. They are quite different and LLDB standalone should 
work with both.

You can check the green dragon bot that we added recently: 
http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake-standalone/
It builds against both versions (and BTW it also dumps CMake cache entries).


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D60180/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D60180



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to