shafik added a comment. In D59847#1443905 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59847#1443905>, @friss wrote:
> As we're just adding test coverage, could we add a little more? > > - Anonymous enum > - Enum through a typedef > - class enum > - enum declared inside of the function rather than at the top-level > - nested enum in a record type > - enum nested in a templated class > - anything else I haven't thought about... Sure that makes sense. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59847/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59847 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
