How about SerializationFormats? On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:22 PM Pavel Labath via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> labath added a comment. > > FileFormats wouldn't be generic enough to capture the gdb-remote or > debug-info-server protocol code. However, even calling gdb-remote protocol > a "format" is still a bit of a stretch. I think there is enough similarity > between gdb-remote and minidump code for them to be in the same module > (both convert some (and often the same) data structures into some (file or > wire) format), but they're also sufficiently different for them to live in > different places. So yeah, if we want the protocol code to live in a > different library (Protocols ?), then FileFormats is a better name here. > > > CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION > https://reviews.llvm.org/D58972/new/ > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D58972 > > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
