labath added a comment.

I'd go with the "conservative" approach first. The idea of having lldb loaded 
inside a lit process does not excite me. One of the problems we have with 
dotest is that when lldb crashes during the test, it takes a part of the test 
driver with it which causes some tests to be skipped and the complicates the 
reporting of the result of the crashed test. It's not as bad right now, as 
there is still the main process left to report some kind of an error (back in 
the days when tests were run sequentially in a single process, the entire test 
suite would just stop), but I still think it would be nice to avoid these 
issues in the new framework.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D54731



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to