JDevlieghere added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53834#1281822, @labath wrote:
> Why did you change the function name? I think it would be nice to keep > "executable" or something to that effect in the name (e.g. the llvm function > has "program"), given that the underlying function checks for the executable > bit, and so it cannot be used for general searches. Yep you're right, this wasn't clear from the doxygen but I should've checked the llvm implementation. https://reviews.llvm.org/D53834 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
