zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53662#1279777, @jingham wrote:
> Yes, that usage is exactly the sort of use I was talking about. When we get > an ObjC object and want to find its dynamic type, we read the type name by > following the object's ISA pointer to the Class object. Then we go to look > up the type from that name. We know we want an exact match to the name we > found, but there's nothing that says the same module can't have an C++ class > with the same name as an ObjC class. So that code needs to get all the types > found, and sort through them for the one that is an ObjC interface type, and > discard all the others. You will need to support that behavior somehow. So just to make sure I understand, The C++ and ObjC classes are both potentially in the same Module, both potentially with the same name, correct? https://reviews.llvm.org/D53662 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
