On 29/10/18 15:06, Zachary Turner wrote:
> Even in this exact case we have the multiple variants situation. If we
> use the substitutions method we would reduce the test coverage by half,
> which doesn’t seem like a good idea.

Which variants do you have in mind? This patch creates two tests: one
which has REQUIRES: windows, and another which has UNSUPPORTED: windows.
With the substitution we would have just one test, which runs everywhere
(but tests slightly different things).

> 
> Similarly, in the target variables tests i added to the native pdb
> plugin Jim was asking if I could also enable that exact same test for
> other platforms. But it’s not possible without a way to run multiple
> variants. And for tests where no running process is required I think
> it’s a worthy goal to try to do that.


I certainly don't disagree with that, but I think there may be room for
both approaches.
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to