jankratochvil added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFUnit.cpp:179
+ if (!m_die_array.empty()) {
+ lldbassert(!m_first_die || m_first_die == m_die_array.front());
+ m_first_die = m_die_array.front();
----------------
labath wrote:
> xbolva00 wrote:
> > xbolva00 wrote:
> > > @jankratochvil is this correct assert? Our downstream lldb based on lldb
> > > 7 with our custom targets hits this assert. If we remove it, we see no
> > > obvious breakages.
> > cc @labath
> I agree with Jan. The two dies should be the same. The fact that they aren't
> probably means there is a bug somewhere. It would be good to know how the two
> dies differ and what is the input dwarf they are generated from.
A fix of this assertion is now submitted as: D53255
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46810
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
