teemperor added a comment. > CompletionRequest - this sounds like it could go next to the command > interpreter
Yeah, makes sense. Even though Utility classes then can either not offer completion methods (currently only ArchSpec is doing that) or work around that with a forward decl. But I think that's not a big issue. https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
