Won't this break client code that was calling StepOver? We are pretty serious
about maintaining binary compatibility with the SB API's.
Jim
> On Jun 20, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Alexander Polyakov via Phabricator
> <revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> apolyakov added a comment.
>
> I think we just can make old versions of API methods returning SBError in all
> cases. This way we'll deal with SBError and won't break down API calls.
> For example:
>
> // old
> void StepOver() {
> ...
> }
>
> // new
> SBError StepOver() {
> ...
> return sb_error;
> }
>
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D47991
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
