labath added a comment. Actually, my plan was to follow this up with a patch which removes usages of that enumeration from the internal api altogether (basically do a `s/GetLLDBPath(ePathTypeXXX/GetXXXPath`). That should make the internal api nicer, and provide a clean separation between the internal and public api (thereby taking pressure off of adding new enums to the public api just because we have a new kind of an internal path).
I was considering in which order to submit the patches. In the end I chose this one because it will make the second patch slightly smaller, but I can do it in the other order too... https://reviews.llvm.org/D48215 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
