polyakov.alex added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47838#1124730, @labath wrote:
> I don't know if there is any spec about what the gdb-mi protocol should use > for thread identification, but I think the most important part is to be > consistent. If you use indexes in one place and tid's in another you'll > confuse the hell out of clients trying to talk to lldb-mi. Due to https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Threads.html, gdb has its own thread numbers for each thread of an inferior. So we should do the same, I guess. https://reviews.llvm.org/D47838 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
