sas added a comment.

> One idea I had was to introduce another target for the framwork itself, e.g. 
> lldbFramework, which gets built if LLDB_BUILD_FRAMEWORK is set. It would 
> depend on liblldb and all the necessary tools, headers, etc, that the 
> framework would need. That way liblldb can depend only on what it needs to 
> build instead of treating it as both the library and the entire framework. 
> How do you feel about this?

I think this is the cleanest way of handling this. If @labath agrees and if 
it's not too much of a pain to implement in cmake, we should do this.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D47801



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to