jankratochvil added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47492#1121543, @dblaikie wrote:
> Happy to help explain it - which part(s) are you having a bit of trouble with? What's wrong on this implementation <https://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/incredibleshrinkingvector.C>? > It seems like the main one is that the implementation can't be sure that > malloc was used to allocate the memory - since the global allocation function > can be replaced & there's no convenient way to detect that. The example above does verify whether the vector uses default libstdc++ std::allocator which uses libstdc++ ::operator new which uses malloc(). Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D47492 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
