aprantl added a comment. The code looks good — I think it would be worthwhile to try and convert this test to a LIT test. You can try to model it after `lit/Expr/TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test`. You will also need to modify `lit/lit.cfg` to define a `%lldb-mi` variable, but that should be straightforward. Let me know if that works. If we run into too many problems we can stick to the expect-style tests for now, but I'd like to do this experiment at the very beginning so all the subsequent patches can benefit from it.
Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D46588 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
