On Tue, 8 May 2018 at 17:12, via lldb-commits <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> So…. if the name in the type entry did not include the <params> then the indexing would automatically do what you want; you would need to reconstruct the <params> from the template parameter children of the DIE. Would that help? > On the LLVM side we have debated the merits of <params> in the name back and forth. I would have to investigate the current state of the world; I know that for PS4 we prefer to have the children and not put <params> in the name, while others prefer it the other way around. If LLDB came out preferring not to have a decorated name, it should not be hard to accommodate that in Clang. I like this idea. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
