jankratochvil added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40468#1080751, @labath wrote:
> Awesome, thanks. I think we can get this one out of the way. Thanks, I will check it in next days. > check-lit is a lit-selftest. This test should not be run as a part of that. > Did you perhaps mean check-lldb-lit (which should probably be removed because > it's now practically an alias for check-lldb)? Yes, I was wrongly running `check-lit` instead of `check-lldb-lit`, thanks for the correction. https://reviews.llvm.org/D40468 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
