JDevlieghere added a comment. Alright, I'm convinced this is the way to go.
- For (1) I'll see if I can get some inspiration from the visit logic in dotest.py. I guess the functionality is similar. I agree on doing this in a separate tool, especially if we want to remove functionality from dotest in the long run. - For the lit stuff I'll wait on input from Zachary, but it doesn't seem to be too hard either. - No objections to skipping lldb-dotest, it was only meant to support the whole lit thing. If we don't need it the better, it has already caused me some minor headaches :-) I'll leave this diff open for the central discussion until I have diffs for the sub-problems. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45215 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
