ping. I might consider reverting this and the other commits without tests bay the end of the week unless we have a story for testing here. It's been one month.
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Davide Italiano <dccitali...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Jason Molenda <jmole...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 28, 2018, at 9:59 PM, Davide Italiano <dccitali...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Davide Italiano <dccitali...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Jason Molenda via lldb-commits >>>> <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>> Author: jmolenda >>>>> Date: Thu Jan 11 17:16:13 2018 >>>>> New Revision: 322339 >>>>> >>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=322339&view=rev >>>>> Log: >>>>> When parsing the target.xml register file, if no architecture has >>>>> been specified yet (either by the user, or by one of the lldb >>>>> extensions like qHostInfo or qProcessInfo), and the target.xml >>>>> includes a <architecture> tag specifying x86_64, set the architecture >>>>> appropriately. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure what we can expect to see in the <architecture> tag, so >>>>> I'm only doing this for x86_64 right now where I've seen "i386:x86_64" >>>>> used. I've seen a target.xml from a jtag board that sends just "arm" >>>>> because it doesn't know more specifically what type of board it is >>>>> connected to... >>>>> >>>>> <rdar://problem/29908970> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Jason, >>>> is there a way to test this change? >>>> >>> >>> ping? Any news on this front? >> >> Thanks for the reminder. I need to look at doing this - I'm in the middle >> of another patch right now but I'll return to this after that. > > weekly ping :) > > -- > Davide _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
