jingham accepted this revision. jingham added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I was under the impression that this was found by a test case failure. Anyway, given that we've got different kinds of DWARF CU's, wouldn't it be better to add an attribute describing them, rather than using semi-unrelated pieces of information like this? I wouldn't hold up this patch on that suggestion, but this does seem kind of indirect... https://reviews.llvm.org/D35740 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
