On May 30, 6:02pm, ulrich.weig...@de.ibm.com ("Ulrich Weigand") wrote:
-- Subject: Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r303907 - Fix bug #28898
| Hmm, from looking at the version of libedit I'm using it would
| appear that it should correctly handle either:
| - a narrow char read function installed via el=5Fset; or
| - a wide char read function installed via el=5Fwset
| which seems reasonable to me at first glance.
Yes, indeed.
| However, LLDB currently uses a wide char read function but installs
| it with el=5Fset, which is what breaks. This would seem to be rather
| a LLDB problem, or am I missing something?
Newer version of libedit broke this compatibility:
el_gets -> narrow_read_function
el_wgets -> wide_read_function
and now they have:
el_{w,}gets -> wide_read_function
I think that the best way is to put it back (i.e. narrow libedit
functions require a narrow read function), and bump the version of libedit.
Of course that does not help people who have versions of libedit that
broke this compatibility (these define el_rfunc_t in histedit.h).
christos
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
