labath added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33426#772174, @bgianfo wrote:
> @jingham @labath do you have any more feedback? As Jim pointed out, the Resume command does not do what I thought it does, so having it in the test makes no sense. One option would be to just leave out the calls to Resume (as they don't do anything anyway) and go with your workaround of testing the threads that happened to stop at the breakpoint on the first run. The other option would be to replace the Resume call with something that does what we intended (one such candidate would be thread.StepOut). I prefer the second one as it gives a more deterministic output, but I think both of them are good enough. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33426 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
