jmajors marked 12 inline comments as done.
jmajors added inline comments.

================
Comment at: unittests/tools/lldb-server/tests/MessageObjects.h:52
+
+  unsigned long ReadRegister(unsigned long register_id) const;
+
----------------
labath wrote:
> tberghammer wrote:
> > "unsigned long" is only 32 bit on some systems but a register can be 
> > arbitrary large so the return value should be something more generic. This 
> > is true for every location you are working with registers.
> changing to uint64_t does not really solve the issue Tamas was pointing out, 
> it possibly even makes it worse. The reason I did not bring it up until now 
> is that `long` happens match the size of general purpose registers, which are 
> the ones that we care about for the moment, which was kinda nice.
> 
> However, intel sse registers can be up to 512 bits wide, so we will need to 
> have something more generic sooner or later. lldb has a `RegisterValue` class 
> for this purpose, so we should probably use that.  If it shows that it makes 
> the code too clunky, we can add some accessor functions which assert that the 
> size of register is e.g. sizeof(void*) and return a simple integer. They can 
> then be used it cases where you know that the register must contain a 
> pointer-sized value.
Rather than trying to test and convert them all, I just left them as strings. I 
only access one value (the PC), so I'm converting it as I need it.


================
Comment at: unittests/tools/lldb-server/tests/MessageObjects.h:33-42
+  lldb::pid_t pid;
+  lldb::pid_t parent_pid;
+  uint32_t real_uid;
+  uint32_t real_gid;
+  uint32_t effective_uid;
+  uint32_t effective_gid;
+  std::string triple;
----------------
tberghammer wrote:
> A large part of these variables are never read by anybody. Do we want to keep 
> them around just in case or should we remove them?
I figured I might as well parse the whole message at once, in case new tests 
need the pieces.



https://reviews.llvm.org/D32930



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to