================
@@ -182,29 +181,27 @@ template <typename Proto> class IOTransport : public
JSONTransport<Proto> {
using Message = typename JSONTransport<Proto>::Message;
using MessageHandler = typename JSONTransport<Proto>::MessageHandler;
- IOTransport(lldb::IOObjectSP in, lldb::IOObjectSP out)
- : m_in(in), m_out(out) {}
+ IOTransport(MainLoop &loop, lldb::IOObjectSP in, lldb::IOObjectSP out)
+ : m_loop(loop), m_in(in), m_out(out) {}
llvm::Error Send(const typename Proto::Evt &evt) override {
return Write(evt);
}
+
llvm::Error Send(const typename Proto::Req &req) override {
return Write(req);
}
+
llvm::Error Send(const typename Proto::Resp &resp) override {
return Write(resp);
}
- llvm::Expected<MainLoop::ReadHandleUP>
- RegisterMessageHandler(MainLoop &loop, MessageHandler &handler) override {
+ llvm::Error RegisterMessageHandler(MessageHandler &handler) override {
Status status;
- MainLoop::ReadHandleUP read_handle = loop.RegisterReadObject(
+ m_read_handle = m_loop.RegisterReadObject(
m_in, [this, &handler](MainLoopBase &base) { OnRead(base, handler); },
status);
- if (status.Fail()) {
- return status.takeError();
- }
- return read_handle;
+ return status.takeError();
}
----------------
da-viper wrote:
I don't see a reason we heed to hold a reference to the Mainloop as we get it
from `registerReadObject` and only use it there. especially since the MCP
`Server::Accept` provides one and we have one in DAP. Unless I am missing
something.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179564
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
