================
@@ -5357,3 +5358,43 @@ void Target::NotifyBreakpointChanged(
if (EventTypeHasListeners(Target::eBroadcastBitBreakpointChanged))
BroadcastEvent(Target::eBroadcastBitBreakpointChanged, breakpoint_data_sp);
}
+
+llvm::Error
+EvaluateExpressionOptions::SetBooleanLanguageOption(llvm::StringRef
option_name,
+ bool value) {
+ if (option_name.empty())
+ return llvm::createStringError("Can't set an option with an empty name.");
+
+ GetLanguageOptions().AddBooleanItem(option_name, value);
----------------
jimingham wrote:
There doesn't seem to be any system yet for the Language to validate the
options you are setting in it. It would be a stretch to require you to put
that machinery in place just for this option. But we should at least have a
big FIXME here because we really should come up with a way to do that. And we
should probably add a note to the documentation that at present we don't
validate the spelling of options set this way.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179208
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
