================
@@ -189,6 +190,10 @@ static bool FillStackFrames(DAP &dap, lldb::SBThread 
&thread,
 
 llvm::Expected<protocol::StackTraceResponseBody>
 StackTraceRequestHandler::Run(const protocol::StackTraceArguments &args) const 
{
+  const lldb::StateType process_state = dap.target.GetProcess().GetState();
+  if (!lldb::SBDebugger::StateIsStoppedState(process_state))
+    return llvm::make_error<NotStoppedError>();
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:

Would it be worthwhile to have a `DAP::ProcessIsStopped` to avoid the 
repetition?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179202
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to