0 means 0 here. For the time being, we don't have a way to specify infinite gdb timeout.
On 15 April 2017 at 15:45, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > Does 0 mean infinite here? If so are the newly introduced semantics here > still correct? > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:34 AM Pavel Labath via Phabricator via > lldb-commits <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> labath accepted this revision. >> labath added a comment. >> This revision is now accepted and ready to land. >> >> looks good, thank you. >> >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D32087 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-commits mailing list >> lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits >> >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
