================
@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ add_lldb_library(lldbTarget
lldbUtility
lldbValueObject
lldbPluginProcessUtility
+
+ CLANG_LIBS
+ clangCodeGen
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
> Can you elaborate on this restriction? Given that LLDB already links against
> Clang it's not obvious to me why linking against clangCodeGen would be a
> problem
AFAIU the core of LLDB is supposed to be as generic as possible. Plugins are
supposed to provide the abstractions over programming language/runtime
specifics. There's some discussion here:
https://lldb.llvm.org/resources/contributing.html#lldb-plugins-and-their-dependencies
I'm not sure whether there's more to it other than "it's LLDB's preferred
architectural design". @JDevlieghere @jimingham will be able to say more on this
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165996
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
