dtcxzyw wrote: > With DW_AT_bit_size recently implemented in LLDB for base types, this is > still relevant. Feel free to reopen, otherwise I'll do so when I get a minute
Feel free to take this :) I may not have enough bandwidth. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137123 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
